A hernia occurs when an internal organ bulges through the
wall of the damaged muscle or tissue that normally contains it. They can occur
in different parts of the body and are accordingly named as inguinal, hiatal,
incisional, femoral and umbilical. The surgical mesh used in the hernia repair
surgeries is available in sheets, patches and plugs.
The uses of the surgical meshes have been popularly used and
the patient preferred its use too as it offers faster recovery time. Generally,
these meshes are made from synthetic material or animal tissues. Non-absorbable hernia mesh is considered a
permanent implant but for the absorbable meshes, it is more of a temporary
solution that supports the damaged area while allowing new tissue growth.
Unfortunately, these meshes have been associated with some
life threatening complications that led to the filing of abdominal hernia mesh
lawsuit.
Accusations
The leading manufacturers of hernia meshes are Ethicon, C.R.
Bard and Atrium.
The mesh implant surgery, as advertised, creates a sense of
confidence in the patient that it would help them revive the positive health
conditions. However, this is not the condition for all the patients. Serious
life threatening conditions have often been reported after the hernia mesh implant
surgery that demanded another invasive surgery to cure the broken meshes. Patients can consult abdominal hernia mesh lawsuit attorneys to get their claims in case
of any physical injury post the implant surgery.
The main points of allegation include:
·
The manufacturers hided the probable side
effects of the mesh implant
·
There was not enough warning on the product that
mentioned about the complications such as adhesion or perforation
·
The makers failed to conduct any proper clinical
trial of the devices before releasing them into the market for public use
·
They kept on misrepresenting the meshes as a
safe and effective treatment for than the existing hernia repair procedures
Have hernia mesh recall lawsuits been filed?
Across the nation, numerous lawsuits have been filed
accusing the mesh makers. Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers were merely
subjected to the FDA’s expedited approval process to get their products
released into the market. Claims against Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon related
to its Physiomesh products have been consolidated into Multi-District
Litigations (MDLs). It is a better step to go with the case as these centralize
the pretrial activities for multiple cases to save the court costs and save
time as well as the attorneys’ fees. Claims against Atrium over its C-Qur
products have also been made into Multi-District Litigations.
Accusations against the particular mesh makers
The abdominal hernia
mesh lawsuit related specifically to Physiomesh state that the multi-layer
coating in the devices caused obstruction in adequate incorporation of the
mesh. Additionally, they have allegedly been insufficient to withstand the
normal abdominal force which caused herniations within the mesh.
Atrium (C-Qur) hernia mesh asserts how the fish oil gel coating
resulted in detachment of the implanted device. It caused adhesions and bowel
complications in patients.
Covidien hernia mesh, a Bard product, cited how the
resin-based plastic cover caused perforations, pain, obstructions, and
infections by coming in contact with the body fluids and tissues.
You deserve justice if you have suffered from the faulty
hernia mesh complications. And, the winning team of attorneys at
HerniaMesh.Claims can help you find out whether your case is eligible for
financial compensation or not. Get a free evaluation of the case over
http://herniamesh.claims/.
Comments
Post a Comment