A hernia mesh lawsuit is a legal claim against the mesh manufacturer by a patient who has been implanted with faulty mesh device and suffered serious complications and injuries post the surgery. The lawsuits allege that the mesh devices were imperfectly designed and that the mesh makers failed adequately to warn patients of known and foreseeable health risks and side effects.
Why are people suing?
Using surgical mesh to repair a hernia isn’t a new concept. While the materials might change, the surgery is one of the most popular ways to cure the condition of hernia. Due to unjustly dangerous and defective designs used in several different surgical mesh products, victims are filing abdominal hernia mesh lawsuit to claim financial compensation. Individuals have suffered from complications such as:
• Severe abdominal pain
• Organ perforation, adhesions or erosion
• Infections or allergic reactions
• Surgical removal of hernia mesh
Why are people suing?
Using surgical mesh to repair a hernia isn’t a new concept. While the materials might change, the surgery is one of the most popular ways to cure the condition of hernia. Due to unjustly dangerous and defective designs used in several different surgical mesh products, victims are filing abdominal hernia mesh lawsuit to claim financial compensation. Individuals have suffered from complications such as:
• Severe abdominal pain
• Organ perforation, adhesions or erosion
• Infections or allergic reactions
• Surgical removal of hernia mesh
Some of the lawsuit allegations raised against the medical device makers include:
• Failure to sufficiently research the hernia mesh;
• Failure to appropriately investigate reports of the health issues problems after the mesh was introduced;
• Failed to promptly issue any hernia mesh recall after the complications were discovered;
• Failure to warn about the potential hernia mesh injury risk;
• Designing and selling imperfect and unreasonably dangerous hernia patch products;
• Placing earnings before the interests and safety of consumers.
Related cases
Physiomesh cases assert that the multi-layer coating used prevented adequate incorporation of the mesh, resulting in serious complications. Further, the mesh was found to be allegedly insufficient to withstand normal abdominal forces, forming herniations through the implanted mesh.
Atrium (C-Qur) hernia mesh cases state that its fish oil gel coating caused the intricacies such as detachment from the implanted device. It resulted in adhesions and adherence to internal organs, which often happened to be fatal. Severe abdominal pain and recurrence of the hernia, requiring multiple surgeries were reported.
Cases related to Covidien hernia (sold by C.R. Bard, Inc.) assert that a resin-based plastic was used in Covidien’s hernia meshes. The plastic was the subject of a manufacturer’s Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), and was found to be wrongly placed as a part of the medical applications involving implantation in the human body. It caused perforations, severe pain, obstructions, and infections, all of which are considered in abdominal hernia mesh lawsuit.
Contact HerniaMesh.Claims to set up a free consultation with one of the highly skilled attorneys on hernia mesh litigations. They are experts in medical lawsuits and will stand up for you to speak up against the pharmaceutical giants who chose profits over public health. You don't need to pay a dime unless your case is successful.
Find out more about the lawsuits and the compensation over http://herniamesh.claims/ or dial (855) 748 6227.
Comments
Post a Comment